Nanonets Scanned PDF Processing Limitations
Understanding Nanonets' struggles with poor quality scans, retraining requirements, and why specialized financial OCR matters for accounting workflows.
Try Zera Books for one weekQuick Answer
Nanonets' OCR struggles with scanned bank statements due to several core limitations: benchmark tests show weak performance with low-resolution images and multiple font styles, users report buggy behavior and inconsistent processing speeds, and the system requires hours of retraining when accuracy drops. For optimal results, Nanonets needs 300 DPI scans with high contrast—conditions rarely met with real-world financial documents.
Zera OCR is trained specifically on 2.8M+ bank statements and handles any scan quality without templates or retraining. Built for accounting workflows, not generic document processing.
Overview: Nanonets Scanned PDF Challenges
Nanonets markets itself as an AI-powered OCR solution capable of handling low-quality scans and handwritten documents. However, when processing real-world scanned bank statements—the messy PDFs accounting firms receive daily—Nanonets reveals significant limitations that impact accuracy, consistency, and workflow efficiency.
Recent benchmark testing exposed these challenges: Nanonets-OCR2 achieved the lowest scores among OCR solutions tested, particularly struggling with documents featuring disorganized layouts, multiple font styles, and low-resolution scans. These aren't edge cases—they're the standard reality for bank statement processing.
User reviews corroborate these findings, describing Nanonets as "very buggy at times, with a lot of variation in speed"—exactly what you can't afford during month-end close when processing 50+ client statements. The platform's general-purpose design means it lacks the financial document specialization required for consistent, production-grade results.
Key Limitations with Scanned Documents
Nanonets' OCR encounters specific failure modes when processing scanned bank statements that directly impact accounting workflows:
Layout Recognition Failures
Models struggle with disorganized text layouts—mixed line ordering, inconsistent capitalization, and multi-column formats common in bank statements. This causes transaction rows to merge incorrectly or critical data to be skipped entirely.
Low-Resolution Image Degradation
Performance drops significantly with low-resolution scans—exactly what clients provide when photographing statements or using consumer-grade scanners. Basic OCR features fail on blurry photos, crumpled documents, and faded thermal print.
Font Variation Confusion
Bank statements frequently mix fonts—bold headers, condensed account numbers, italicized footnotes. Nanonets' models show degraded accuracy when documents contain multiple font styles, causing field extraction errors.
Inconsistent Processing Speed
User reports highlight "a lot of variation in speed"—some documents process in seconds, others take minutes with no clear pattern. This unpredictability disrupts batch processing workflows and makes deadline planning impossible.
These limitations compound when processing multi-account statements or handling common scanned PDF scenarios that accounting firms encounter daily. What works for clean, digital invoices fails for messy, real-world bank statements.
Template Retraining Requirements
When Nanonets misses data points—which happens frequently with scanned documents—you face a critical operational burden: model retraining that takes hours. This isn't a one-time setup cost; it's an ongoing maintenance tax every time you encounter a new bank format or quality issue.
The Retraining Cycle
- 1.Detection: You discover Nanonets missed transaction dates or amounts during manual review (lost time)
- 2.Preparation: Collect example documents showing the correct data (requires storing client PDFs)
- 3.Annotation: Manually label fields in 50+ sample documents (hours of repetitive work)
- 4.Training: Submit for model retraining (hours of processing time)
- 5.Validation: Test retrained model on new documents (hope it works)
- 6.Repeat: Next month, encounter another bank format variation, start over
This retraining requirement fundamentally contradicts the promise of automated bank statement processing. You're not saving time—you're trading manual data entry for manual template maintenance. Compare this to dynamic processing systems that adapt automatically without human intervention.
For accounting firms managing 50+ clients with statements from dozens of different banks, template-based OCR creates an unsustainable operational burden. Every new bank format means hours of retraining. Every bank layout change breaks existing templates. You need zero-template solutions to scale.
Image Quality Requirements
Nanonets documentation reveals strict requirements for acceptable OCR accuracy: minimum 300 DPI resolution, well-lit conditions, high contrast, and no skew or tilt. These standards make sense for controlled document scanning—but they're completely unrealistic for real-world accounting workflows.
What Clients Actually Send You
You can't control how clients provide documents. Small business owners photograph statements with their phones. Freelancers forward scanned PDFs from consumer scanners. Clients email years-old records retrieved from storage boxes. If your OCR only works with pristine 300 DPI scans, it doesn't work for accounting.
This quality sensitivity explains why accounting firms struggle with Nanonets accuracy issues—the software performs well in controlled testing but fails with real client documents. You need OCR specifically trained on the messy reality of scanned financial documents.
Nanonets vs Zera Books: Scanned PDF Processing Comparison
Direct comparison of how each platform handles the scanned PDF scenarios accounting firms encounter daily:
| Feature | Nanonets | Zera Books |
|---|---|---|
| OCR Technology | General-purpose AI OCR trained on mixed documents | Zera OCR: Financial-specific training on 2.8M+ bank statements |
| Training Required | Minimum 50 images per bank format, hours of retraining when accuracy drops | Zero template training—dynamic processing adapts automatically |
| Handles Poor Quality Scans | Struggles with low-resolution images, blurry photos, inconsistent layouts | 95%+ accuracy on image-based statements, any quality |
| Retraining When Accuracy Drops | Hours of manual annotation + processing time | No retraining needed—model learns from 847M+ transactions |
| Minimum Resolution | 300 DPI for best results (unrealistic for client documents) | Works with any resolution—smartphone photos to high-res scans |
| Financial Document Specialization | Generic OCR optimized for invoices and receipts | Built exclusively for bank statements, checks, financial docs |
| Processing Speed Consistency | "Very buggy at times, with a lot of variation in speed" (user reviews) | Consistent processing—batch 50+ statements with predictable timing |
| Setup Time | Template creation + training data collection + retraining cycles | Upload and process immediately—no setup required |
The core difference: Nanonets applies general OCR technology to financial documents and expects you to compensate through training. Zera OCR is built from the ground up for bank statements, trained on millions of real-world scanned documents that reflect actual accounting workflows.
Why Zera OCR Handles Scans Better
Financial Document Specialization
Zera OCR wasn't adapted from generic document processing—it was trained exclusively on 2.8M+ bank statements and 847M+ transactions from the beginning. This specialization means the model recognizes bank-specific patterns that general OCR misses:
- Transaction row structures (date, description, withdrawal, deposit, balance columns)
- Account metadata positioning (account numbers, routing numbers, statement periods)
- Multi-account layouts (checking + savings in single PDF)
- Financial number formats (negative amounts, running balances, currency symbols)
Dynamic Processing vs Template Matching
Template-based OCR (Nanonets' approach) works like this: "Does this document match Template A? No. Template B? No. Template C?..." When you encounter a new bank format or quality variation, the system fails until you create a new template.
Zera's dynamic processing asks: "What financial document patterns exist in this image?" The AI recognizes transactions, dates, and amounts based on learned patterns—not rigid templates. New bank formats process successfully without retraining because the model understands banking concepts, not just pixel positions.
99.6%
Field-level extraction accuracy on scanned statements
95%+
Accuracy on poor-quality image scans
Zero
Template training or retraining required
This specialization extends to the entire workflow: AI transaction categorization, multi-account detection, duplicate prevention, and direct QuickBooks/Xero integration. Zera Books isn't general OCR adapted for banking—it's a complete platform built for accounting workflows from day one.
Real-World Impact on Accounting Workflows
These technical limitations translate directly to operational problems that slow down your firm:
With Template-Based OCR (Nanonets)
- Spend 2-4 hours creating templates for each new bank format
- Manually review every conversion because accuracy varies with scan quality
- Contact clients requesting higher-quality scans (delays, frustration)
- Retrain models when banks update statement layouts (ongoing maintenance)
- Deal with unpredictable processing speeds during month-end rush
With Specialized Financial OCR (Zera Books)
- Upload any bank statement and process immediately—no setup
- Consistent 99.6% accuracy regardless of scan quality or bank format
- Accept client documents as-is (phone photos, consumer scans, faxes)
- Zero maintenance when banks change layouts (dynamic processing adapts)
- Batch process 50+ statements with predictable timing for deadline planning
The difference becomes exponential at scale. Processing 10 clients' statements monthly? Template maintenance is annoying but manageable. Processing 100 clients across 50 different banks? Template-based OCR becomes an operational nightmare that consumes more time than manual data entry.
This is why accounting firms choose specialized financial automation platforms over general document OCR. When your core business is processing bank statements, you need technology built specifically for that workflow—not generic tools you'll spend months adapting. See how other converters handle scanned PDFs.
"My clients send me all kinds of messy PDFs from different banks. This tool handles them all and saves me probably 10 hours a week."
Ashish Josan
Manager, CPA at Manning Elliott
Stop Fighting with Scanned PDFs
Process any bank statement—digital or scanned, pristine or messy—with 99.6% accuracy. No templates, no retraining, no quality requirements. Try Zera Books for one week.
Start your trial