The Pricing Models: Where It Gets Expensive
When evaluating bank statement processing tools, pricing structure matters more than base price. Both AutoEntry and Hubdoc use models that create hidden costs or force compromises.
AutoEntry
Credit-Based3 credits per bank statement page
Hubdoc
BundledOr $12/month standalone
AutoEntry's credit-based model means every page costs money. For accounting firms processing multiple clients with multi-account statements, costs add up quickly. Hubdoc appears free, but you're trading cost for manual work and missing features accounting firms actually need.
What Each Tool Actually Does With Bank Statements
Both tools market themselves as bank statement processors, but their capabilities differ significantly when you're managing multi-account clients or need categorized transactions ready for QuickBooks.
AutoEntry Bank Statement Capabilities
- High accuracy extraction - Owned by Sage, focuses on data quality
- Statement reconciliation - Matches invoices to supplier statements
- Multi-platform integration - Xero, Sage, QuickBooks support
- No AI categorization - Extracts data but doesn't auto-categorize transactions
- Credit anxiety - 3 credits per page creates cost tracking overhead
Hubdoc Bank Statement Capabilities
- 700+ bank connections - Auto-fetches statements from financial institutions
- PDF to CSV conversion - Converts statements to CSV format
- Free with Xero - Included in Xero Starter/Standard/Premium
- No line-item extraction - Frustrated users report missing features
- Manual CSV upload - Still requires manual import to accounting software
- Stagnant development - Users report lack of updates since Xero acquisition
Notice what's missing from both: AI-powered transaction categorization. You extract the data, then manually categorize transactions before importing to QuickBooks or Xero. For firms managing 20+ clients, that's hours of manual work monthly.
